[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <10077418.cjgahspKMt@amdc3058>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:35:45 +0100
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, vinholikatti@...il.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: remove the duplicated checking for supporting
clkscaling
Hi,
On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 09:19:57 PM Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> There are same conditions for checking whether supporting clkscaling or
> not.
> When ufshcd is supporting clkscaling, active_reqs should be decreased by
> two.
I guess you meant "one" here, not "two"?
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index dc6efbd..f2cbc71 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -4598,8 +4598,6 @@ static void __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> }
> if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba))
> hba->clk_scaling.active_reqs--;
> - if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba))
> - hba->clk_scaling.active_reqs--;
> }
>
> /* clear corresponding bits of completed commands */
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists