[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dd298f19613023950555d2742d0d4014@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:19:07 -0700
From: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>
To: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, vinholikatti@...il.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: remove the duplicated checking for supporting
clkscaling
On 2017-03-21 05:19, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> There are same conditions for checking whether supporting clkscaling or
> not.
> When ufshcd is supporting clkscaling, active_reqs should be decreased
> by
> two.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index dc6efbd..f2cbc71 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -4598,8 +4598,6 @@ static void __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl(struct
> ufs_hba *hba,
> }
> if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba))
> hba->clk_scaling.active_reqs--;
> - if (ufshcd_is_clkscaling_supported(hba))
> - hba->clk_scaling.active_reqs--;
> }
>
> /* clear corresponding bits of completed commands */
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists