linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [v2] arm64: define BUG() instruction without CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:57:07 +0000
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] arm64: define BUG() instruction without CONFIG_BUG

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 05:29:19PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Catalin Marinas
> <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 03:51:54PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Catalin Marinas
> >> <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
> 
> >> Taht was certainly not intended, and I don't see yet what exactly is going on.
> >> What is your setting for CONFIG_BUG and CONFIG_BUGVERBOSE?
> >
> > CONFIG_BUG=y
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=y
> 
> Ok, I found the typo, can you just fold this in, or should I send an
> updated patch?

I'll fold it in. Thanks.

-- 
Catalin