Message-ID: <842616ad-1e04-9e56-3137-dd8aed1dd896@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:39:10 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     sean.wang@...iatek.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, Landen.Chao@...iatek.com, keyhaede@...il.com,
        objelf@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] net-next: dsa: add dsa support for
 Mediatek MT7530 switch

On 03/21/2017 02:35 AM, sean.wang@...iatek.com wrote:
> From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
> 
> MT7530 is a 7-ports Gigabit Ethernet Switch that could be found on
> Mediatek router platforms such as MT7623A or MT7623N platform which
> includes 7-port Gigabit Ethernet MAC and 5-port Gigabit Ethernet PHY.
> Among these ports, The port from 0 to 4 are the user ports connecting
> with the remote devices while the port 5 and 6 are the CPU ports
> connecting into Mediatek Ethernet GMAC.
> 
> For port 6, it can communicate with the CPU via Mediatek Ethernet GMAC
> through either the TRGMII or RGMII which could be controlled by phy-mode
> in the dt-bindings to specify which mode is preferred to use. And for
> port 5, only RGMII can be specified. However, currently, only port 6 is
> being supported in this DSA driver.
> 
> The driver is made with the reference to qca8k and other existing DSA
> driver. The most of the essential callbacks of the DSA are already
> support in the driver, including tag insert for user port distinguishing,
> port control, bridge offloading, STP setup and ethtool operation to allow
> DSA to model each user port into a standalone netdevice as the other DSA
> driver had done.

Overall, this looks pretty nice and clean, a few comments below

> 
> Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>
> ---

> +static void
> +mt7530_fdb_read(struct mt7530_priv *priv, struct mt7530_fdb *fdb)
> +{
> +	u32 reg[3];
> +	int i;
> +
> +	/* Read from ARL table into an array */
> +	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> +		reg[i] = mt7530_read(priv, MT7530_TSRA1 + (i * 4));
> +
> +		dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s(%d) reg[%d]=0x%x\n",
> +			__func__, __LINE__, i, reg[i]);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* vid - 11:0 on reg[1] */
> +	fdb->vid = (reg[1] >> 0) & 0xfff;
> +	/* aging - 31:24 on reg[2] */
> +	fdb->aging = (reg[2] >> 24) & 0xff;
> +	/* portmask - 11:4 on reg[2] */
> +	fdb->port_mask = (reg[2] >> 4) & 0xff;
> +	/* mac - 31:0 on reg[0] and 31:16 on reg[1] */
> +	fdb->mac[0] = (reg[0] >> 24) & 0xff;
> +	fdb->mac[1] = (reg[0] >> 16) & 0xff;
> +	fdb->mac[2] = (reg[0] >>  8) & 0xff;
> +	fdb->mac[3] = (reg[0] >>  0) & 0xff;
> +	fdb->mac[4] = (reg[1] >> 24) & 0xff;
> +	fdb->mac[5] = (reg[1] >> 16) & 0xff;
> +	/* noarp - 3:2 on reg[2] */
> +	fdb->noarp = ((reg[2] >> 2) & 0x3) == STATIC_ENT;

Could you add some definitions for the bits and masks that you are
shifting here?

> +}
> +
> +static void
> +mt7530_fdb_write(struct mt7530_priv *priv, u16 vid,
> +		 u8 port_mask, const u8 *mac,
> +		 u8 aging, u8 type)
> +{
> +	u32 reg[3] = { 0 };
> +	int i;
> +
> +	/* vid - 11:0 on reg[1] */
> +	reg[1] |= (vid & 0xfff) << 0;
> +	/* aging - 31:25 on reg[2] */
> +	reg[2] |= (aging & 0xff) << 24;
> +	/* portmask - 11:4 on reg[2] */
> +	reg[2] |= (port_mask & 0xff) << 4;
> +	/* type - 3 indicate that entry is static wouldn't
> +	 * be aged out and 0 specified as erasing an entry
> +	 */
> +	reg[2] |= (type & 0x3) << 2;
> +	/* mac - 31:0 on reg[0] and 31:16 on reg[1] */
> +	reg[1] |= mac[5] << 16;
> +	reg[1] |= mac[4] << 24;
> +	reg[0] |= mac[3] << 0;
> +	reg[0] |= mac[2] << 8;
> +	reg[0] |= mac[1] << 16;
> +	reg[0] |= mac[0] << 24;
> +
> +	/* Wrirte array into the ARL table */
> +	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
> +		mt7530_write(priv, MT7530_ATA1 + (i * 4), reg[i]);
> +}

Same here.

> +
> +static int
> +mt7530_pad_clk_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds, int mode)
> +{
> +	struct mt7530_priv *priv = ds->priv;
> +	u32 ncpo1, ssc_delta, trgint, i;
> +
> +	switch (mode) {
> +	case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII:
> +		trgint = 0;
> +		ncpo1 = 0x0c80;
> +		ssc_delta = 0x87;
> +		break;
> +	case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_TRGMII:
> +		trgint = 1;
> +		ncpo1 = 0x1400;
> +		ssc_delta = 0x57;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		pr_err("xMII mode %d not supported\n", mode);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

You may be able to move this to an adjust_link callback that the PHY
library would call when the PHY gets setup and the port is finally used,
as opposed to doing this upfront during driver initialization.


> +mt7530_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> +{
> +	struct mt7530_priv *priv = ds->priv;
> +	int ret, i, phy_mode;
> +	u8  cpup_mask = 0;
> +	u32 id, val;
> +	struct regmap *regmap;
> +	struct device_node *dn;
> +
> +	/* Make sure that cpu port specfied on the dt is appropriate */
> +	if (!dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, MT7530_CPU_PORT)) {
> +		dev_err(priv->dev, "port not matched with the CPU port\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

This is kind of a hard error, in that case, a sensible thing to do could
be issue a warning to the user telling that the configuration does not
permit the use of Mediatek tags. Your get_tag_protocol() function could
then return DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE here instead of DSA_TAG_PROTO_MTK. It
would still allow an user to utilize the switch, and we would know what
is wrong with the configuration/board setup though.


> +
> +	/* The parent node of master_netdev which holds the common system
> +	 * controller also is the container for two GMACs nodes representing
> +	 * as two netdev instances.
> +	 */
> +	dn = ds->master_netdev->dev.of_node->parent;
> +	priv->ethernet = syscon_node_to_regmap(dn);
> +	if (IS_ERR(priv->ethernet))
> +		return PTR_ERR(priv->ethernet);
> +
> +	regmap = devm_regmap_init(ds->dev, NULL, priv,
> +				  &mt7530_regmap_config);
> +	if (IS_ERR(regmap))
> +		dev_warn(priv->dev, "phy regmap initialization failed");
> +
> +	phy_mode = of_get_phy_mode(ds->ports[ds->dst->cpu_port].dn);
> +	if (phy_mode < 0) {
> +		dev_err(priv->dev, "Can't find phy-mode for master device\n");
> +		return phy_mode;
> +	}
> +	dev_info(priv->dev, "phy-mode for master device = %x\n", phy_mode);

An adjust_link() callback which has a proper PHY device structure would
be more appropriate to look up the phy_mode rather than doing this here.

[snip]

> +	mt7530_clear(priv, MT7530_MFC, UNU_FFP_MASK);
> +
> +	/* Fabric setup for the cpu port */
> +	for (i = 0; i < MT7530_NUM_PORTS; i++)

Are not you missing an opening parenthesis here in the for() statement?

> +		if (dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, i)) {
> +			/* Enable Mediatek header mode on the cpu port */
> +			mt7530_write(priv, MT7530_PVC_P(i),
> +				     PORT_SPEC_TAG);
> +
> +			/* Setup the MAC by default for the cpu port */
> +			mt7530_write(priv, MT7530_PMCR_P(i), PMCR_CPUP_LINK);
> +
> +			/* Disable auto learning on the cpu port */
> +			mt7530_set(priv, MT7530_PSC_P(i), SA_DIS);
> +
> +			/* Unknown unicast frame fordwarding to the cpu port */
> +			mt7530_set(priv, MT7530_MFC, UNU_FFP(BIT(i)));
> +
> +			/* CPU port gets connected to all user ports of
> +			 * the switch
> +			 */
> +			mt7530_write(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(i),
> +				     PCR_MATRIX(ds->enabled_port_mask));
> +
> +			cpup_mask |= BIT(i);
> +		}
> +
> +	/* Fabric setup for the all user ports */
> +	for (i = 0; i < MT7530_NUM_PORTS; i++)
> +		if (ds->enabled_port_mask & BIT(i)) {
> +			/* Setup the MAC by default for all user ports */
> +			mt7530_write(priv, MT7530_PMCR_P(i),
> +				     PMCR_USERP_LINK);
> +
> +			/* The user port gets connected to the cpu port only */
> +			mt7530_write(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(i),
> +				     PCR_MATRIX(cpup_mask));
> +		}

This should be moved to the port_enable() function.

[snip]

> +#define wait_condition_timeout(condition, timeout)			\
> +({									\
> +	long __ret = 0;							\
> +	unsigned long toj;						\
> +	toj = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(timeout);			\
> +									\
> +	for ( ; !(condition) && !time_after_eq(jiffies, toj) ; )	\
> +		cond_resched();						\
> +									\
> +	if (time_after_eq(jiffies, toj))				\
> +		__ret = -ETIMEDOUT;					\
> +	__ret;								\
> +})

Can you use read*_poll_timeout() instead of this?


> +/* struct mt7530_priv -	This is the main datasructure for holding the state
> + *			of the driver
> + * @dev:		The device pointer
> + * @ds:			The pointer to the dsa core structure
> + * @bus:		The bus used for the device and built-in PHY
> + * @ethsys:		The regmap used for enabling the necessary PLL
> + * @ethernet:		The regmap used for access TRGMII-based registers
> + * @core_pwr:		The power supplied into the core
> + * @io_pwr:		The power supplied into the I/O
> + * @mcm:		Flag for distinguishing if standalone IC or module
> + *			coupling
> + * @reset:		The descriptor for GPIO line tied to its reset pin
> + * @phy_mode:		The xMII for cpu port used
> + * @ports:		Holding the state amongs ports
> + * @reg_mutex:		The lock for protecting among process accessing
> + *			registers
> + */

Kudos for using kernel doc here.
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists