[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170322175920.bcltzwega6dts2n4@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 18:59:20 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] printk: introduce printing kernel thread
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:45:50PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> sysrq is potentially even trickier. can we always wake_up() kernel
> thread from sysrq? there probably might be cases when we can't rely
> on the scheduler.
sysrq runs from interrupt context, right? Should be able to do wakeups.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists