linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 2/9] iio: adc: add support for X-Powers AXP20X and AXP22X PMICs ADCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGb2v655AfEavMqVV-XTyYzHWt5qFsMnoMsTVd8HRDkCgjiTeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:52:47 +0800
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:     Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...e-electrons.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        knaack.h@....de, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.xyz>,
        Liam Breck <liam@...workimprov.net>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        "open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 2/9] iio: adc: add support for X-Powers AXP20X
 and AXP22X PMICs ADCs

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:34:45PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> P.S. I'm thinking about having MFD_AXP20X imply its various sub-drivers.
>> Not sure if that was the intended usage of the new imply syntax though.
>
> I think adding "default MFD_AXP20X" to the sub-drivers is cleaner,
> as you will not end up with a long list.

I'd still need to add imply statements for the various subsystems though,
like regulators, power supplies, extcon, etc..
But I suppose that's cleaner, and fits the original intent of the syntax.

ChenYu