linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 2/9] iio: adc: add support for X-Powers AXP20X and AXP22X PMICs ADCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Mar 2017 08:55:19 +0100
From:   Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        "open list:THERMAL" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Liam Breck <liam@...workimprov.net>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.xyz>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>, knaack.h@....de,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 2/9] iio: adc: add support for X-Powers AXP20X
 and AXP22X PMICs ADCs

Hi,

On 23/03/2017 10:52, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:34:45PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> P.S. I'm thinking about having MFD_AXP20X imply its various sub-drivers.
>>> Not sure if that was the intended usage of the new imply syntax though.
>>
>> I think adding "default MFD_AXP20X" to the sub-drivers is cleaner,
>> as you will not end up with a long list.
> 
> I'd still need to add imply statements for the various subsystems though,
> like regulators, power supplies, extcon, etc..
> But I suppose that's cleaner, and fits the original intent of the syntax.
> 

Hum. I don't really understand what you are saying.. Am I supposed to
modify something or, is it okay and we're waiting for Lee to apply on
his tree?

Thanks in advance for clearing it up,

Quentin

-- 
Quentin Schulz, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com