[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37780c56-b1e1-80d6-dec5-3160cd3e6a94@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:07:23 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] KVM: VMX: Fix enable VPID conditions
> - if (!cpu_has_vmx_vpid())
> + if (!cpu_has_vmx_vpid() || !cpu_has_vmx_invvpid() ||
> + !(cpu_has_vmx_invvpid_single() || cpu_has_vmx_invvpid_global()))
I still don't like this way of indentation, but looks like I am the only
one complaining :)
So I think this patch is just fine now.
> enable_vpid = 0;
> +
> if (!cpu_has_vmx_shadow_vmcs())
> enable_shadow_vmcs = 0;
> if (enable_shadow_vmcs)
>
--
Thanks,
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists