[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1703231507260.2304@knanqh.ubzr>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:14:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, rafael@...nel.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 2/3] irq: Track the interrupt timings
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> +#define IRQ_TIMINGS_SHIFT 5
> +#define IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE (1 << IRQ_TIMINGS_SHIFT)
> +#define IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK (IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE - 1)
> +
> +struct irq_timing {
> + u32 irq;
> + u64 ts;
> +};
> +
> +struct irq_timings {
> + struct irq_timing values[IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE]; /* our circular buffer */
This is not very space efficient because of alignment restrictions from
the u64 in struct irq_timing. 25% of the memory is wasted.
You could consider having two arrays instead:
u32 irq_values[IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE];
u64 ts_values[IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE];
Nicolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists