[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3271639.DkaRJdVeCG@diego>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 08:12:07 +0100
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: 陈亮 <cl@...k-chips.com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, zhengxing@...k-chips.com,
andy.yan@...k-chips.com, jay.xu@...k-chips.com,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, paweljarosz3691@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
wsa@...-dreams.de, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, jic23@...nel.org,
knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
wxt@...k-chips.com, david.wu@...k-chips.com,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, shawn.lin@...k-chips.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dianders@...omium.org,
yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, afaerber@...e.de, shawnguo@...nel.org,
khilman@...libre.com, arnd@...db.de, fabio.estevam@....com,
zhangqing@...k-chips.com, kever.yang@...k-chips.com,
tony.xie@...k-chips.com, huangtao@...k-chips.com,
yhx@...k-chips.com, rocky.hao@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: add core dtsi file for RK3328 SoCs
Am Freitag, 24. März 2017, 14:31:28 CET schrieb 陈亮:
> Hi, Heiko:
>
> 在 2017年03月23日 11:33, 陈亮 写道:
> > Hi, Heiko
> >
> > 在 2017年03月21日 16:55, Heiko Stübner 写道:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Am Donnerstag, 16. März 2017, 21:17:22 CET schrieb cl@...k-chips.com:
> >>> + assigned-clock-parents =
> >>> + <&cru HDMIPHY>, <&cru PLL_APLL>,
> >>> + <&cru PLL_GPLL>, <&xin24m>,
> >>> + <&xin24m>, <&xin24m>;
> >>> + assigned-clock-rates =
> >>> + <0>, <61440000>,
> >>> + <0>, <24000000>,
> >>> + <24000000>, <24000000>,
> >>> + <15000000>, <15000000>,
> >>> + <100000000>, <100000000>,
> >>> + <100000000>, <100000000>,
> >>> + <50000000>, <100000000>,
> >>> + <100000000>, <100000000>,
> >>> + <50000000>, <50000000>,
> >>> + <50000000>, <50000000>,
> >>> + <24000000>, <600000000>,
> >>> + <491520000>, <1200000000>,
> >>> + <150000000>, <75000000>,
> >>> + <75000000>, <150000000>,
> >>> + <75000000>, <75000000>,
> >>> + <300000000>, <100000000>,
> >>> + <300000000>, <200000000>,
> >>> + <400000000>, <500000000>,
> >>> + <200000000>, <300000000>,
> >>> + <300000000>, <250000000>,
> >>> + <200000000>, <100000000>,
> >>> + <24000000>, <100000000>,
> >>> + <150000000>, <50000000>,
> >>> + <32768>, <32768>;
> >>> + };
> >>> +
> >>> + gmac2io: eth@...40000 {
> >>
> >> phandle should be gmac instead?
> >> Node name, ethernet@...40000
> >
> > RK3328 have another gmac channel with PHY in the soc, so gmac2io mean
> > the channel with the PHY outside, and it is also called gmac2io in the
> > TRM.
>
> So we remain gmac2io, or you have other idea?
No, that is ok in that case.
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists