linux-kernel - Re: [v2 0/9] Early boot time stamps for x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703251119180.5612@nanos>
Date:   Sat, 25 Mar 2017 11:25:46 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>
cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [v2 0/9] Early boot time stamps for x86

On Fri, 24 Mar 2017, Pavel Tatashin wrote:

> changelog
> ---------
> v1 - v2
> 	In patch "x86/tsc: tsc early":
> 	- added tsc_adjusted_early()
> 	- fixed 32-bit compile error use do_div()

Did you actually read my last reply on V1 of this?

I made it entirely clear that the way this is done, i.e. hacking it into
the earliest boost stage is not going to happen.

Further I asked you to hold off until I found some time to look into this
in detail.

So what's the point of ignoring what I said and resending the whole lot
with some more hackery applied?

I don't care about you wasting your time, but I very much care about my
time.

Thanks,

	tglx