[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYQb9wL+g5T08Mgv+RQYaUZPoS+0RXXfk2XdD+AHSs9gA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:26:49 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Victor Gu <xigu@...vell.com>, Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Wilson Ding <dingwei@...vell.com>,
Hua Jing <jinghua@...vell.com>,
Neta Zur Hershkovits <neta@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] pinctrl: armada-37xx: Add pin controller support
for Armada 37xx
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Gregory CLEMENT
<gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> The Armada 37xx SoC come with 2 pin controllers: one on the south
> bridge (managing 28 pins) and one on the north bridge (managing 36 pins).
>
> At the hardware level the controller configure the pins by group and not
> pin by pin. This constraint is reflected in the design of the driver:
> only the group related functions are implemented.
Interesting!
> +static int armada_37xx_pmx_direction_input(struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info,
> + unsigned int offset)
> +{
> + unsigned int reg = OUTPUT_EN;
> + unsigned int mask;
> +
> + if (offset >= GPIO_PER_REG) {
> + offset -= GPIO_PER_REG;
> + reg += sizeof(u32);
> + }
> + mask = BIT(offset);
> +
> + return regmap_update_bits(info->regmap, reg, mask, 0);
> +}
> +
> +
> +
A bit of excess whitespace, OK nitpicking.
Then this stuff:
> +static int armada_37xx_add_function(struct armada_37xx_pmx_func *funcs,
> + int *funcsize, const char *name)
> +{
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + if (*funcsize <= 0)
> + return -EOVERFLOW;
> +
> + while (funcs->ngroups) {
> + /* function already there */
> + if (strcmp(funcs->name, name) == 0) {
> + funcs->ngroups++;
> +
> + return -EEXIST;
> + }
> + funcs++;
> + i++;
> + }
> +
> + /* append new unique function */
> + funcs->name = name;
> + funcs->ngroups = 1;
> + (*funcsize)--;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int armada_37xx_fill_group(struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info, int base)
> +{
> + int n, num = 0, funcsize = info->data->nr_pins;
> +
> + for (n = 0; n < info->ngroups; n++) {
> + struct armada_37xx_pin_group *grp = &info->groups[n];
> + int i, j, f;
> +
> + grp->pins = devm_kzalloc(info->dev,
> + (grp->npins + grp->extra_npins) *
> + sizeof(*grp->pins), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!grp->pins)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < grp->npins; i++)
> + grp->pins[i] = grp->start_pin + base + i;
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < grp->extra_npins; j++)
> + grp->pins[i+j] = grp->extra_pin + base + j;
> +
> + for (f = 0; f < NB_FUNCS; f++) {
> + int ret;
> + /* check for unique functions and count groups */
> + ret = armada_37xx_add_function(info->funcs, &funcsize,
> + grp->funcs[f]);
> + if (ret == -EOVERFLOW)
> + dev_err(info->dev,
> + "More functions than pins(%d)\n",
> + info->data->nr_pins);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + continue;
> + num++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + info->nfuncs = num;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int armada_37xx_fill_func(struct armada_37xx_pinctrl *info)
> +{
> + struct armada_37xx_pmx_func *funcs = info->funcs;
> + int n;
> +
> + for (n = 0; n < info->nfuncs; n++) {
> + const char *name = funcs[n].name;
> + const char **groups;
> + int g;
> +
> + funcs[n].groups = devm_kzalloc(info->dev, funcs[n].ngroups *
> + sizeof(*(funcs[n].groups)),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!funcs[n].groups)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + groups = funcs[n].groups;
> +
> + for (g = 0; g < info->ngroups; g++) {
> + struct armada_37xx_pin_group *gp = &info->groups[g];
> + int f;
> +
> + for (f = 0; f < NB_FUNCS; f++) {
> + if (strcmp(gp->funcs[f], name) == 0) {
> + *groups = gp->name;
> + groups++;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
I would be happy if you add kerneldoc to these functions and explain
what they do. Because I don't get it. I guess they are filling in the data
structures but yeah. Hard to follow.
> + match = of_match_node(armada_37xx_pinctrl_of_match, np);
> + info->data = (struct armada_37xx_pin_data *)match->data;
Use of_device_get_match_data()
> +static struct platform_driver armada_37xx_pinctrl_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "armada-37xx-pinctrl",
> + .of_match_table = armada_37xx_pinctrl_of_match,
> + },
> + .probe = armada_37xx_pinctrl_probe,
> +};
> +
> +builtin_platform_driver(armada_37xx_pinctrl_driver);
It almost looks like your could use builting_platform_driver_probe() actually,
and tag the costly initfunctions with __init so they get dicarded after probe.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists