linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Support uncompressed kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1490606744.3661.7.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2017 17:25:44 +0800
From:   Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Support uncompressed kernel

On Mon, 2017-03-27 at 09:58 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2017-03-24 13:35:40 [+0800], Chao Peng wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >     kernel               kernel size    time in
> > > > > decompress_kernel
> > > > >     compressed (gzip)    3.3M           53ms
> > > > >     uncompressed         14M            3ms
> > > > 
> > Exactly, LZ4 is the fastest. It takes 16ms to complete the
> > decompression. Still sounds a little longer when compared to
> > uncompressed kernel.
> 
> Are we seriously talking here about one-time improvement of 13ms
> boot time?

The usage model for us is to lunch kernel in virtual machine and there
will be thousands of instances lunched and shutdowned/re-lunched
frequently, so every single million-second helps. And 13ms means 20%
improvement to our existing optimization (the other part besides
decompression is optimized to ~40ms).

Chao
> 
> > 
> > Chao
> 
> Sebastian