linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] h8300: put bitsperlong.h in uapi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1470ef61-3b51-869a-ded5-87b956e83d2d@6wind.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:43:00 +0200
From:   Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, bp@...en8.de,
        slash.tmp@...e.fr, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, msalter@...hat.com, jengelh@...i.de,
        hch@...radead.org, Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>,
        mpe@...erman.id.au, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] h8300: put bitsperlong.h in uapi

Le 27/03/2017 à 07:31, Masahiro Yamada a écrit :
[snip]
>> -#endif /* __ASM_H8300_BITS_PER_LONG */
>> diff --git a/arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h b/arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..e56cf72369b6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/h8300/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
>> +#ifndef _UAPI_ASM_H8300_BITS_PER_LONG
>> +#define _UAPI_ASM_H8300_BITS_PER_LONG
> 
> 
> Just a minor comment.
> 
> The include guard was originally __ASM_H8300_BITS_PER_LONG.
> This will change it into _ASM_H8300_BITS_PER_LONG
> (after _UAPI is stripped by headers_install.sh)
> 
> I just thought _UAPI__ASM_H8300_BITS_PER_LONG might be even safer,
> but I know I am nit-picking.  I can apply this as-is.
> I leave it to you.
I intentionnaly "clean" that, but I will restore it, no problem ;-)


Regards,
Nicolas