[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c9d0a97b-a017-3319-6014-d876405ae2a8@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 19:25:21 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, dvyukov@...gle.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: cleanup the page tracking SRCU instance
On 28/03/2017 5:40 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> void kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 64697fe475c3..f2379673912a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -8070,6 +8070,7 @@ void kvm_arch_sync_events(struct kvm *kvm)
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_update_work);
> kvm_free_all_assigned_devices(kvm);
> kvm_free_pit(kvm);
> + kvm_page_track_cleanup(kvm);
> }
Moving it to kvm_arch_destroy_vm() is better as the init
function is called in kvm_arch_init_vm().
Otherwise it looks great to me:
Reviewed-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>
Thanks for the fix.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists