[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170328133225.GS2957@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:32:25 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we
get a deferral
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 03:25:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > If, while locating GPIOs by name, we get probe deferral, we should
> > immediately report it to caller rather than trying to fall back to parsing
> > unnamed GPIOs from _CRS block.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
>
> Can I get some indication from Mika/Rafael/Andy whether this is correct?
Sorry, I saw the patch but then forgot to ack it.
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists