linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1490713380.708.32.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:03:00 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc:     Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / gpio: do not fall back to parsing _CRS when we
 get a deferral

On Tue, 2017-03-28 at 15:25 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
> <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > If, while locating GPIOs by name, we get probe deferral, we should
> > immediately report it to caller rather than trying to fall back to
> > parsing
> > unnamed GPIOs from _CRS block.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> 
> Can I get some indication from Mika/Rafael/Andy whether this is
> correct?

While Mika agrees on the change, I would like nevertheless to hear Hans'
opinion or even Tested-by tag since it was his fix around those lines.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy