linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] usb: phy: phy-qcom-8x16-usb: Remove redundant extcon register/unregister

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87zig5frgo.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:42:15 +0300
From:   Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
To:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, neilb@...e.com, jun.li@....com,
        peter.chen@...escale.com, broonie@...nel.org,
        baolin.wang@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] usb: phy: phy-qcom-8x16-usb: Remove redundant extcon register/unregister


Hi,

Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org> writes:
> Since usb phy core has added common code to register or unregister
> extcon device, then phy-qcom-8x16-usb driver does not need its own
> code to register/unregister extcon device, then remove them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>

so previous patch helped *ONE* single user? Was it really beneficial if
it's all for a single user? Which duplicated code did it remove?

-- 
balbi