lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:16:00 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Add cpus_list rdtgroup file On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 09:08:26AM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:09:48PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > While playing with the resctrl interface I found it much > > easier to deal with cpumask list rather than just regular > > cpumask. > > Could you please explain specifically why and when it's easier > to deal with cpumask list? In programming cases, cpumask > and cpumask list are almost same. And people are working > on higher level tools to control resctrl. The tools can > hide detailed regular cpumask or cpumask list and user > doesn't need to care lower level format of cpumask. So > is it really useful to add cpus_list? well I'm not aware about any such tool so I used resctrl interface directly, and in that case it was much simpler jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists