linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] sd: Consider max_xfer_blocks if opt_xfer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq18tnm3hou.fsf@oracle.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:30:57 -0400
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     Fam Zheng <famz@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sd: Consider max_xfer_blocks if opt_xfer_blocks is unusable

Fam Zheng <famz@...hat.com> writes:

>> 	rw_max = min_not_zero(logical_to_sectors(sdp, dev_max),
>>                               BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS);
>
> Yes, it is better. Is it okay to make the change when you apply?

Sure. Applied to 4.11/scsi-fixes.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering