lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170331040525.GA11195@lemon.lan>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:05:25 +0800
From:   Fam Zheng <famz@...hat.com>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sd: Consider max_xfer_blocks if opt_xfer_blocks is
 unusable

On Thu, 03/30 11:30, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> Fam Zheng <famz@...hat.com> writes:
> 
> >> 	rw_max = min_not_zero(logical_to_sectors(sdp, dev_max),
> >>                               BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS);
> >
> > Yes, it is better. Is it okay to make the change when you apply?
> 
> Sure. Applied to 4.11/scsi-fixes.

Cool. Thanks!

Fam

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ