linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: armada-38x: label USB and SATA nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170331182111.GJ22609@lunn.ch>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:21:11 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: armada-38x: label USB and SATA nodes

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 07:39:20PM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 18:50:15 +0200
> Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> 
> > > -			sata@...00 {
> > > +			satac0: sata@...00 {  
> > 
> > Hi Ralph
> > 
> > Why the c in satac0?
> 
> For controller and to not conflict with a use case of sata0 for a port,
> similarly to pciec and pcie1. See armada-385-synology-ds116.dts.

:~/linux/arch/arm/boot/dts$ ls *ds116*
ls: cannot access '*ds116*': No such file or directory

But anyway, a few boards seem to solve this by calling the controller
node ahci0: and the port sata0:

> > > -			usb3@...00 {
> > > +			usb3_0: usb3@...00 {
> > >  				compatible =
> > > "marvell,armada-380-xhci"; reg = <0xf0000 0x4000>,<0xf4000 0x4000>;
> > >  				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 16
> > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@
> > >  				status = "disabled";
> > >  			};
> > >  
> > > -			usb3@...00 {
> > > +			usb3_1: usb3@...00 {
> > >  				compatible =
> > > "marvell,armada-380-xhci"; reg = <0xf8000 0x4000>,<0xfc000 0x4000>;
> > >  				interrupts = <GIC_SPI 17
> > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;  
> > 
> > I can understand what you are saying. But does anybody else care? Are
> > there other .dtsi files differentiating between USB 1.1, 2 and 3?
> 
> It's handled differently where ever I looked, some do some don't. A
> case for distinguishing USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 like this is
> armada-388-gp.dts.

Humm...

                        /* CON4 */
                        usb@...00 {
                                vcc-supply = <&reg_usb2_0_vbus>;
                                status = "okay";
                        };


			/* CON5 */
                        usb3@...00 {
                                usb-phy = <&usb2_1_phy>;
                                status = "okay";
                        };

                        /* CON7 */
                        usb3@...00 {
                                usb-phy = <&usb3_phy>;
                                status = "okay";
                        };

Is this clear? Is CON5 a USB 3 host, but has a USB 2 PHY connected to
it? CON7 is the only true USB 3 port? I think some comments written in
schwiizerdÃ¼tsch would be clearre.:-)

		 Andrew