| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CALrZqyNXv53FeHNMpJ-i8Lkize-TTMR7LB6ssa0H4gS-L9JAeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 00:13:15 +0530
From: SIMRAN SINGHAL <singhalsimran0@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: health: afe440x: Remove code in comments
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 22:16 +0530, simran singhal wrote:
>> Commenting out code is a bad idea.
>> As comments are for explaining what code is about.
>
> patch doesn't match commit message.
In commit message I am clearly saying commenting out the code is a bad Idea.
As comments are for explaining what code is about.
And that's what I am doing in the patch deleting the commented codes.
My subject also says "Remove code in comments"
Than what is not matching?
>
>> Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iio/health/afe440x.h | 58 --------------------------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 58 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/health/afe440x.h b/drivers/iio/health/afe440x.h
>> index 1a0f247..71e2f0e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/health/afe440x.h
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/health/afe440x.h
>> @@ -88,56 +88,11 @@
>> #define AFE440X_CONTROL0_WRITE 0x0
>> #define AFE440X_CONTROL0_READ 0x1
>>
>> -#define AFE440X_INTENSITY_CHAN(_index, _mask) \
>> - { \
>> - .type = IIO_INTENSITY, \
>> - .channel = _index, \
>> - .address = _index, \
>> - .scan_index = _index, \
>> - .scan_type = { \
>> - .sign = 's', \
>> - .realbits = 24, \
>> - .storagebits = 32, \
>> - .endianness = IIO_CPU, \
>> - }, \
>> - .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | \
>> - _mask, \
>> - .indexed = true, \
>> - }
>> -
>> -#define AFE440X_CURRENT_CHAN(_index) \
>> - { \
>> - .type = IIO_CURRENT, \
>> - .channel = _index, \
>> - .address = _index, \
>> - .scan_index = -1, \
>> - .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | \
>> - BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE), \
>> - .indexed = true, \
>> - .output = true, \
>> - }
>> -
>> struct afe440x_val_table {
>> int integer;
>> int fract;
>> };
>>
>> -#define AFE440X_TABLE_ATTR(_name, _table) \
>> -static ssize_t _name ## _show(struct device *dev, \
>> - struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) \
>> -{ \
>> - ssize_t len = 0; \
>> - int i; \
>> - \
>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(_table); i++) \
>> - len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%d.%06u ", \
>> - _table[i].integer, \
>> - _table[i].fract); \
>> - \
>> - buf[len - 1] = '\n'; \
>> - \
>> - return len; \
>> -} \
>> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(_name)
>>
>> struct afe440x_attr {
>> @@ -147,17 +102,4 @@ struct afe440x_attr {
>> unsigned int table_size;
>> };
>>
>> -#define to_afe440x_attr(_dev_attr) \
>> - container_of(_dev_attr, struct afe440x_attr, dev_attr)
>> -
>> -#define AFE440X_ATTR(_name, _field, _table) \
>> - struct afe440x_attr afe440x_attr_##_name = { \
>> - .dev_attr = __ATTR(_name, (S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR), \
>> - afe440x_show_register, \
>> - afe440x_store_register), \
>> - .field = _field, \
>> - .val_table = _table, \
>> - .table_size = ARRAY_SIZE(_table), \
>> - }
>> -
>> #endif /* _AFE440X_H */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists