[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1490986224.27353.20.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:50:24 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: SIMRAN SINGHAL <singhalsimran0@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iio: health: afe440x: Remove code in comments
On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 00:13 +0530, SIMRAN SINGHAL wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 22:16 +0530, simran singhal wrote:
> > > Commenting out code is a bad idea.
> > > As comments are for explaining what code is about.
> >
> > patch doesn't match commit message.
>
> In commit message I am clearly saying commenting out the code is a bad Idea.
> As comments are for explaining what code is about.
> And that's what I am doing in the patch deleting the commented codes.
>
> My subject also says "Remove code in comments"
>
> Than what is not matching?
Read your own patch.
You are removing #defines not comments.
If the whole thing is in comments, then
the #defines immediately above what you
are removing should also be deleted.
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: simran singhal <singhalsimran0@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/iio/health/afe440x.h | 58 --------------------------------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 58 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/health/afe440x.h b/drivers/iio/health/afe440x.h
> > > index 1a0f247..71e2f0e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iio/health/afe440x.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/iio/health/afe440x.h
> > > @@ -88,56 +88,11 @@
> > > #define AFE440X_CONTROL0_WRITE 0x0
> > > #define AFE440X_CONTROL0_READ 0x1
> > >
> > > -#define AFE440X_INTENSITY_CHAN(_index, _mask) \
> > > - { \
> > > - .type = IIO_INTENSITY, \
> > > - .channel = _index, \
> > > - .address = _index, \
> > > - .scan_index = _index, \
> > > - .scan_type = { \
> > > - .sign = 's', \
> > > - .realbits = 24, \
> > > - .storagebits = 32, \
> > > - .endianness = IIO_CPU, \
> > > - }, \
> > > - .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | \
> > > - _mask, \
> > > - .indexed = true, \
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > -#define AFE440X_CURRENT_CHAN(_index) \
> > > - { \
> > > - .type = IIO_CURRENT, \
> > > - .channel = _index, \
> > > - .address = _index, \
> > > - .scan_index = -1, \
> > > - .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) | \
> > > - BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE), \
> > > - .indexed = true, \
> > > - .output = true, \
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > struct afe440x_val_table {
> > > int integer;
> > > int fract;
> > > };
> > >
> > > -#define AFE440X_TABLE_ATTR(_name, _table) \
> > > -static ssize_t _name ## _show(struct device *dev, \
> > > - struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) \
> > > -{ \
> > > - ssize_t len = 0; \
> > > - int i; \
> > > - \
> > > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(_table); i++) \
> > > - len += scnprintf(buf + len, PAGE_SIZE - len, "%d.%06u ", \
> > > - _table[i].integer, \
> > > - _table[i].fract); \
> > > - \
> > > - buf[len - 1] = '\n'; \
> > > - \
> > > - return len; \
> > > -} \
> > > static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(_name)
> > >
> > > struct afe440x_attr {
> > > @@ -147,17 +102,4 @@ struct afe440x_attr {
> > > unsigned int table_size;
> > > };
> > >
> > > -#define to_afe440x_attr(_dev_attr) \
> > > - container_of(_dev_attr, struct afe440x_attr, dev_attr)
> > > -
> > > -#define AFE440X_ATTR(_name, _field, _table) \
> > > - struct afe440x_attr afe440x_attr_##_name = { \
> > > - .dev_attr = __ATTR(_name, (S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR), \
> > > - afe440x_show_register, \
> > > - afe440x_store_register), \
> > > - .field = _field, \
> > > - .val_table = _table, \
> > > - .table_size = ARRAY_SIZE(_table), \
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > #endif /* _AFE440X_H */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists