[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170331041800.ugi4wgmbqx44mbwa@Haydn>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:18:00 -0700
From: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
CC: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
<linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, <kernel-team@...com>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] xfs: Honor FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE when punching ends of files
When punching past EOF on XFS, fallocate(mode=PUNCH_HOLE|KEEP_SIZE) will
round the file size up to the nearest multiple of PAGE_SIZE:
calvinow@...disks/generic-xfs-1 ~$ dd if=/dev/urandom of=test bs=2048 count=1
calvinow@...disks/generic-xfs-1 ~$ stat test
Size: 2048 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 regular file
calvinow@...disks/generic-xfs-1 ~$ fallocate -n -l 2048 -o 2048 -p test
calvinow@...disks/generic-xfs-1 ~$ stat test
Size: 4096 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 regular file
Commit 3c2bdc912a1cc050 ("xfs: kill xfs_zero_remaining_bytes") replaced
xfs_zero_remaining_bytes() with calls to iomap helpers. The new helpers
don't enforce that [pos,offset) lies strictly on [0,i_size) when being
called from xfs_free_file_space(), so by "leaking" these ranges into
xfs_zero_range() we get this buggy behavior.
Fix this by reintroducing the checks xfs_zero_remaining_bytes() did
against i_size at the bottom of xfs_free_file_space().
Reported-by: Aaron Gao <gzh@...com>
Fixes: 3c2bdc912a1cc050 ("xfs: kill xfs_zero_remaining_bytes")
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.8+
Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
index 8b75dce..828532c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
@@ -1311,8 +1311,16 @@ xfs_free_file_space(
/*
* Now that we've unmap all full blocks we'll have to zero out any
* partial block at the beginning and/or end. xfs_zero_range is
- * smart enough to skip any holes, including those we just created.
+ * smart enough to skip any holes, including those we just created,
+ * but we must take care not to zero beyond EOF and enlarge i_size.
*/
+
+ if (offset >= XFS_ISIZE(ip))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (offset + len > XFS_ISIZE(ip))
+ len = XFS_ISIZE(ip) - offset;
+
return xfs_zero_range(ip, offset, len, NULL);
}
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists