[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170331151836.5d89c03a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:18:36 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the mux tree with the arm-soc tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the mux tree got conflicts in:
drivers/Kconfig
drivers/Makefile
between commit:
967c9cca2cc5 ("tee: generic TEE subsystem")
from the arm-soc tree and commit:
1fc1dd988186 ("mux: minimal mux subsystem and gpio-based mux controller")
from the mux tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/Kconfig
index ba2901e76769,a7ea13e1b869..000000000000
--- a/drivers/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/Kconfig
@@@ -204,6 -204,6 +204,8 @@@ source "drivers/fpga/Kconfig
source "drivers/fsi/Kconfig"
+ source "drivers/mux/Kconfig"
+
+source "drivers/tee/Kconfig"
+
endmenu
diff --cc drivers/Makefile
index 5db9aa6beeaf,c0436f6dd5a9..000000000000
--- a/drivers/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/Makefile
@@@ -177,4 -177,4 +177,5 @@@ obj-$(CONFIG_ANDROID) += android
obj-$(CONFIG_NVMEM) += nvmem/
obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA) += fpga/
obj-$(CONFIG_FSI) += fsi/
+ obj-$(CONFIG_MULTIPLEXER) += mux/
+obj-$(CONFIG_TEE) += tee/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists