linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 001/001] drivers/staging/vt6656/main

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1491017782.27353.33.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2017 20:36:22 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
        Chewie Lin <linsh@...gonstate.edu>
Cc:     greg@...ah.com, forest@...ttletooquiet.net,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 001/001] drivers/staging/vt6656/main_usb.c: checkpatch
 warning

On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 04:32 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 06:59:19PM -0700, Chewie Lin wrote:
> > Replace string with formatted arguments in the dev_warn() call. It removes
> > the checkpatch warning:
> > 
> > 	WARNING: Prefer using "%s", __func__ to embedded function names
[]
> Again, checkpatch warning is badly written

In your opinion, what wording would be better?