[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf809000718514ba612b4f7b477586a9@crapouillou.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 12:20:12 +0200
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>, james.hogan@...tec.com,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/14] MIPS: jz4740: DTS: Add nodes for ingenic pinctrl
and gpio drivers
Hi,
Le 2017-04-03 11:57, Sergei Shtylyov a écrit :
> Hello!
>
> On 4/2/2017 11:42 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>
>> For a description of the pinctrl devicetree node, please read
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/ingenic,pinctrl.txt
>>
>> For a description of the gpio devicetree nodes, please read
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/ingenic,gpio.txt
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
> [...]
>
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4740.dtsi
>> b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4740.dtsi
>> index 3e1587f1f77a..9c23c877fc34 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4740.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4740.dtsi
>> @@ -55,6 +55,67 @@
>> clock-names = "rtc";
>> };
>>
>> + pinctrl: ingenic-pinctrl@...10000 {
>
> The node name should be generic, so please rename it to something
> like "pin-controller@..."
OK.
>> + compatible = "ingenic,jz4740-pinctrl";
>> + reg = <0x10010000 0x400>;
>> +
>> + gpa: gpio-controller@0 {
>
> The name should be just "gpio@0", according to ePAPR and its
> successor spec. Although, using the <unit-address> without the "reg"
> prop isn't allowed either...
ePAPR says: "If the node has no reg property, the unit-address may be
omitted if the node name alone differentiates the node from other nodes
at
the same level in the tree."
I could use 'gpio@...k-a', it is allowed by the spec. Or do you prefer
'gpio@0'?
> MBR, Sergei
I'll wait from some feedback on the other patches then send a v5.
Thanks,
-Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists