[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5d195a9-ec3d-1b92-b17c-e87bd6d990cf@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 13:32:46 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>, james.hogan@...tec.com,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/14] MIPS: jz4740: DTS: Add nodes for ingenic pinctrl
and gpio drivers
On 4/3/2017 1:20 PM, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>>> For a description of the pinctrl devicetree node, please read
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/ingenic,pinctrl.txt
>>>
>>> For a description of the gpio devicetree nodes, please read
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/ingenic,gpio.txt
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
>> [...]
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4740.dtsi
>>> b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4740.dtsi
>>> index 3e1587f1f77a..9c23c877fc34 100644
>>> --- a/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4740.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/jz4740.dtsi
>>> @@ -55,6 +55,67 @@
>>> clock-names = "rtc";
>>> };
>>>
>>> + pinctrl: ingenic-pinctrl@...10000 {
>>
>> The node name should be generic, so please rename it to something
>> like "pin-controller@..."
>
> OK.
>
>>> + compatible = "ingenic,jz4740-pinctrl";
>>> + reg = <0x10010000 0x400>;
>>> +
>>> + gpa: gpio-controller@0 {
>>
>> The name should be just "gpio@0", according to ePAPR and its
>> successor spec. Although, using the <unit-address> without the "reg"
>> prop isn't allowed either...
>
> ePAPR says: "If the node has no reg property, the unit-address may be
My copy of ePAPR 1.1 says "must be omitted". :-)
> omitted if the node name alone differentiates the node from other nodes at
> the same level in the tree."
> I could use 'gpio@...k-a', it is allowed by the spec. Or do you prefer 'gpio@0'?
Hm... maybe you should just use the "reg" prop.
> I'll wait from some feedback on the other patches then send a v5.
>
> Thanks,
> -Paul
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists