lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 4 Apr 2017 08:32:22 +0200
From:   Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>
To:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:     <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-ltc4306: LTC4306 and LTC4305 I2C
 multiplexer/switch

On 03.04.2017 16:20, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2017-04-03 15:36, Michael Hennerich wrote:
>> On 03.04.2017 14:03, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> On 2017-03-31 17:29, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for my incremental reviewing...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Another incremental...
>>>
>>>> On 2017-03-29 12:15, michael.hennerich@...log.com wrote:
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	/* Now create an adapter for each channel */
>>>>> +	for (num = 0; num < data->chip->nchans; num++) {
>>>>> +		ret = i2c_mux_add_adapter(muxc, 0, num, 0);
>>>>> +		if (ret) {
>>>>> +			dev_err(&client->dev,
>>>>> +				"failed to register multiplexed adapter %d\n",
>>>>> +				num);
>>>
>>> Just a heads up, I submitted a series to remove a bunch of dev_err calls
>>> when i2c_mux_add_adapter fails. See https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/3/115
>>>
>>> You can remove this one as well.
>>>
>>> And please use a subject of the form:
>>> i2c: mux: ltc4306: <message>
>> ok - no problem.
>
> You managed to drop the spaces after the new colons in the subject.
>
> And maybe there is a problem, because I don't see any reaction to any of
> the review comments I made in https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/31/525
>
> Was that on purpose? Sure, the gpio "jury" is still out on the bigger
> question so maybe you're waiting for that, but there were a few nitpicks
> as well. Anyway, sorry again for failing to compile all comments up front.

Hi Peter,

sorry - this was not on purpose. I simply missed your second to last 
incremental review. I fix the subject now finally.

Thanks for your patience.

>
>> I sent out a new patch. Per Rob's request, I split out the dt-bindings
>> into a separate patch.
>
> Thanks. I think(?) it is customary to have the bindings first, and then
> implement that "specification" in followup patches. No big deal though...
>
> Cheers,
> peda
>
>


-- 
Greetings,
Michael

--
Analog Devices GmbH      Otl-Aicher Strasse 60-64      80807 München
Sitz der Gesellschaft München, Registergericht München HRB 40368,
Geschäftsführer: Peter Kolberg, Ali Raza Husain, Eileen Wynne

Powered by blists - more mailing lists