lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 4 Apr 2017 11:15:33 -0600
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To:     Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Cc:     tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] Regression between Linux 3.16 and 4.8/4.9 on
 Lenovo X60 with coreboot

On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 06:29:06PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:

> Unfortunately, there seems to have been a regression between Linux 3.16 
> and 4.8 and 4.9, so that the Linux kernel doesn’t create the TPM
> device.

That old kernel did not check error codes when reading burst count,
the new one does. It is quite possible the older kernel is failing to
read burst count and subtly malfunctioning.

It would be helpful if you could prove/disprove this statement by
adding some debugging to 3.16.

As to why the burst count cannot be read.. I don't know, check if
increasing the retries helps, it could be this particular TPM is out
of spec for the cold startup process.

> Remove module and run `sudo modprobe tpm_tis itpm=1 force=1`.

Is this really an 'itpm'? It doesn't look like it..

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists