[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170405090203.GA6986@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:02:03 +0100
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
CC: <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <perex@...ex.cz>, <tiwai@...e.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>, <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
<viorel.suman@....com>, <mihai.serban@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: codec: wm8960: Relax bit clock computation
when using PLL
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 07:45:14PM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> Bitclk is derived from sysclk using bclk_divs.
> Sysclk can be derived in two ways:
> (1) directly from MLCK
> (2) MCLK via PLL
>
> Commit 3c01b9ee2ab9d0d ("ASoC: codec: wm8960: Relax bit clock computation")
> relaxed bitclk computation when sysclk is directly derived from MCLK.
>
> Lets do the same thing when sysclk is derived via PLL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
> ---
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Thanks,
Charles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists