[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+NU3M5yuBpK1UGgzCVvq0eABMApCqEe3_d5+tDaABsgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 13:16:58 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/10] Nokia H4+ support
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:33:26PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> >> Here is PATCHv3 for the Nokia bluetooth patchset. I addressed all comments from
>> >> Rob and Pavel regarding the serdev patches and dropped the *.dts patches, since
>> >> they were queued by Tony. I also changed the patch order, so that the serdev
>> >> patches come first. All of them have Acked-by from Rob, so I think it makes
>> >> sense to merge them to serdev subsystem (now) and provide an immutable branch
>> >> for the bluetooth subsystem.
>> >
>> > Greg doesn't read cover letters generally and since the serdev patches
>> > are Cc rather than To him, he's probably not planning to pick them up.
>>
>> I wonder actually if we should merge all of these via bluetooth-next
>> tree with proper Ack from Greg. However it would be good to also get
>> buy in from Dave for merging this ultimately through net-next.
>
> I don't really care where it goes. I can take the whole thing in my
> tty/serial tree now if no one objects and I get an ack from the relevant
> maintainers {hint...}
I think it is better if it goes thru BT tree. I have another driver
converted that is dependent on this series. There's a couple other
serdev changes on the list too, but this shouldn't depend on them.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists