[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170405202856.GA4854@amd>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 22:28:56 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo F. Padovan" <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/10] Nokia H4+ support
On Wed 2017-04-05 13:16:58, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:33:26PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> >> Hi Rob,
> >>
> >> >> Here is PATCHv3 for the Nokia bluetooth patchset. I addressed all comments from
> >> >> Rob and Pavel regarding the serdev patches and dropped the *.dts patches, since
> >> >> they were queued by Tony. I also changed the patch order, so that the serdev
> >> >> patches come first. All of them have Acked-by from Rob, so I think it makes
> >> >> sense to merge them to serdev subsystem (now) and provide an immutable branch
> >> >> for the bluetooth subsystem.
> >> >
> >> > Greg doesn't read cover letters generally and since the serdev patches
> >> > are Cc rather than To him, he's probably not planning to pick them up.
> >>
> >> I wonder actually if we should merge all of these via bluetooth-next
> >> tree with proper Ack from Greg. However it would be good to also get
> >> buy in from Dave for merging this ultimately through net-next.
> >
> > I don't really care where it goes. I can take the whole thing in my
> > tty/serial tree now if no one objects and I get an ack from the relevant
> > maintainers {hint...}
>
> I think it is better if it goes thru BT tree. I have another driver
> converted that is dependent on this series. There's a couple other
> serdev changes on the list too, but this shouldn't depend on them.
I believe BT tree makes sense. Still it would be nice to get Greg's
ACK ...?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists