[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170407111316.fcjhydgbnf2yulaw@dell>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 12:13:16 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: 冯伟linux <steven_feng@...lsil.com.cn>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mfd:rtsx: do retry when dma transfer error
On Fri, 07 Apr 2017, 冯伟linux wrote:
> HI lee.jones
>
> I submitted my patch a few months ago, but the patch was not merged.
> I want to know what causes this, so that I can update the patch and make
> the patch merged.
The patch was missed. I do not know why.
> steven feng
> Realsil Microelectronics CO. LTD.
> Mobile:181-6899-0403 Ext:57594
>
> On 2017年01月05日 17:01, 冯伟linux wrote:
> > From: steven_feng <steven_feng@...lsil.com.cn>
Should be "Steven Feng"
> > the request should be reissued when dma transfer error.
> > for rts5227, the clock freq need to step reduce when error occurred.
Please use correct grammar, including full-stops and capital letters.
> > Signed-off-by: steven_feng <steven_feng@...lsil.com.cn>
"Steven Feng"
> > ---
> > drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> > include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h | 5 +++++
> > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c b/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c
> > index 98029ee..3161c46 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c
> > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> > #include <linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h>
> > +#include <linux/mmc/card.h>
Why is this required?
> > #include <asm/unaligned.h>
> >
> > #include "rtsx_pcr.h"
> > @@ -452,8 +453,12 @@ int rtsx_pci_dma_transfer(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr, struct scatterlist *sglist,
> > }
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&pcr->lock, flags);
> > - if (pcr->trans_result == TRANS_RESULT_FAIL)
> > - err = -EINVAL;
> > + if (pcr->trans_result == TRANS_RESULT_FAIL) {
> > + err = -EILSEQ;
"Illegal byte sequence", really?
> > + if (pcr->dma_error_count < RTS_MAX_TIMES_FREQ_REDUCTION)
> > + pcr->dma_error_count++;
> > + }
> > +
> > else if (pcr->trans_result == TRANS_NO_DEVICE)
> > err = -ENODEV;
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcr->lock, flags);
> > @@ -659,6 +664,13 @@ int rtsx_pci_switch_clock(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr, unsigned int card_clock,
> > if (err < 0)
> > return err;
> >
> > + /* Each time dma transfer error occurs, card clock decreased by 20MHz */
s/dma/DMA/
I would reword as follows:
"Reduce MMC card clock by 20MHz each time a DMA transfer error occurs"
> > + if (card_clock == UHS_SDR104_MAX_DTR &&
> > + pcr->dma_error_count &&
> > + PCI_PID(pcr) == RTS5227_DEVICE_ID)
> > + card_clock = (UHS_SDR104_MAX_DTR -
> > + pcr->dma_error_count * 20000000);
... but won't this only reduce the clock frequency just once?
There is no point bracketing the whole statement.
But you do need to bracket one (the second) section of it.
> > card_clock /= 1000000;
> > pcr_dbg(pcr, "Switch card clock to %dMHz\n", card_clock);
> >
> > @@ -894,6 +906,7 @@ static irqreturn_t rtsx_pci_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > pcr->card_removed |= SD_EXIST;
> > pcr->card_inserted &= ~SD_EXIST;
> > }
> > + pcr->dma_error_count = 0;
> > }
> >
> > if (int_reg & MS_INT) {
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h b/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h
> > index 7eb7cba..116816f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h
> > @@ -850,6 +850,9 @@
> >
> > #define rtsx_pci_init_cmd(pcr) ((pcr)->ci = 0)
> >
> > +#define RTS5227_DEVICE_ID 0x5227
> > +#define RTS_MAX_TIMES_FREQ_REDUCTION 8
> > +
> > struct rtsx_pcr;
> >
> > struct pcr_handle {
> > @@ -957,6 +960,8 @@ struct rtsx_pcr {
> >
> > int num_slots;
> > struct rtsx_slot *slots;
> > +
> > + u8 dma_error_count;
> > };
> >
> > #define CHK_PCI_PID(pcr, pid) ((pcr)->pci->device == (pid))
>
> begin:vcard
> fn;quoted-printable:=E5=86=AF=E4=BC=9F
> n;quoted-printable:;=E5=86=AF=E4=BC=9F
> email;internet:steven_feng@...lsil.com.cn
> tel;cell:18168990403
> version:2.1
> end:vcard
>
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists