| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <E865DE34E934EF47ACC616C10D554F76A8118CF6@RS-MBS01.realsil.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:28:56 +0000
From: 冯伟linux <steven_feng@...lsil.com.cn>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mfd:rtsx: do retry when dma transfer error
> --- a/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h>
> +#include <linux/mmc/card.h>
> Why is this required?
>
The UHS_SER104_MAX_DTR which is in "card_clock = UHS_SER104_MAX_DTR
- (pcr->dma_error_count *20000000)" is defined in linux/mmc/card.h, so
it is required.
> spin_lock_irqsave(&pcr->lock, flags);
> - if (pcr->trans_result == TRANS_RESULT_FAIL)
> - err = -EINVAL;
> + if (pcr->trans_result == TRANS_RESULT_FAIL) {
> + err = -EILSEQ;
> "Illegal byte sequence", really?
>
This errno need to be -EILSEQ.
>>> + if (card_clock == UHS_SDR104_MAX_DTR &&
>>> + pcr->dma_error_count &&
>>> + PCI_PID(pcr) == RTS5227_DEVICE_ID)
>>> + card_clock = (UHS_SDR104_MAX_DTR -
>>> + pcr->dma_error_count * 20000000);
> ... but won't this only reduce the clock frequency just once?
>
> There is no point bracketing the whole statement.
>
> But you do need to bracket one (the second) section of it.
>
The times of DMA transfer error occurrs recorded in dma_error_count,
When DMA transfer error occurrs, the card_clock is reduced by 20MHz.
Others are updated in PATCH v4
steven feng
Realsil Microelectronics CO. LTD.
Mobile：181-6899-0403 Ext：57594
On 2017年04月07日 19:13, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Apr 2017, 冯伟linux wrote:
>
>> HI lee.jones
>>
>> I submitted my patch a few months ago, but the patch was not merged.
>> I want to know what causes this, so that I can update the patch and make
>> the patch merged.
> The patch was missed. I do not know why.
>
>> steven feng
>> Realsil Microelectronics CO. LTD.
>> Mobile：181-6899-0403 Ext：57594
>>
>> On 2017年01月05日 17:01, 冯伟linux wrote:
>>> From: steven_feng <steven_feng@...lsil.com.cn>
> Should be "Steven Feng"
>
>>> the request should be reissued when dma transfer error.
>>> for rts5227, the clock freq need to step reduce when error occurred.
> Please use correct grammar, including full-stops and capital letters.
>
>>> Signed-off-by: steven_feng <steven_feng@...lsil.com.cn>
> "Steven Feng"
>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>>> include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h | 5 +++++
>>> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c b/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c
>>> index 98029ee..3161c46 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/rtsx_pcr.c
>>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>> #include <linux/mfd/core.h>
>>> #include <linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h>
>>> +#include <linux/mmc/card.h>
> Why is this required?
>
>>> #include <asm/unaligned.h>
>>>
>>> #include "rtsx_pcr.h"
>>> @@ -452,8 +453,12 @@ int rtsx_pci_dma_transfer(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr, struct scatterlist *sglist,
>>> }
>>>
>>> spin_lock_irqsave(&pcr->lock, flags);
>>> - if (pcr->trans_result == TRANS_RESULT_FAIL)
>>> - err = -EINVAL;
>>> + if (pcr->trans_result == TRANS_RESULT_FAIL) {
>>> + err = -EILSEQ;
> "Illegal byte sequence", really?
>
>>> + if (pcr->dma_error_count < RTS_MAX_TIMES_FREQ_REDUCTION)
>>> + pcr->dma_error_count++;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> else if (pcr->trans_result == TRANS_NO_DEVICE)
>>> err = -ENODEV;
>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcr->lock, flags);
>>> @@ -659,6 +664,13 @@ int rtsx_pci_switch_clock(struct rtsx_pcr *pcr, unsigned int card_clock,
>>> if (err < 0)
>>> return err;
>>>
>>> + /* Each time dma transfer error occurs, card clock decreased by 20MHz */
> s/dma/DMA/
>
> I would reword as follows:
>
> "Reduce MMC card clock by 20MHz each time a DMA transfer error occurs"
>
>>> + if (card_clock == UHS_SDR104_MAX_DTR &&
>>> + pcr->dma_error_count &&
>>> + PCI_PID(pcr) == RTS5227_DEVICE_ID)
>>> + card_clock = (UHS_SDR104_MAX_DTR -
>>> + pcr->dma_error_count * 20000000);
> ... but won't this only reduce the clock frequency just once?
>
> There is no point bracketing the whole statement.
>
> But you do need to bracket one (the second) section of it.
>
>>> card_clock /= 1000000;
>>> pcr_dbg(pcr, "Switch card clock to %dMHz\n", card_clock);
>>>
>>> @@ -894,6 +906,7 @@ static irqreturn_t rtsx_pci_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>> pcr->card_removed |= SD_EXIST;
>>> pcr->card_inserted &= ~SD_EXIST;
>>> }
>>> + pcr->dma_error_count = 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (int_reg & MS_INT) {
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h b/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h
>>> index 7eb7cba..116816f 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/rtsx_pci.h
>>> @@ -850,6 +850,9 @@
>>>
>>> #define rtsx_pci_init_cmd(pcr) ((pcr)->ci = 0)
>>>
>>> +#define RTS5227_DEVICE_ID 0x5227
>>> +#define RTS_MAX_TIMES_FREQ_REDUCTION 8
>>> +
>>> struct rtsx_pcr;
>>>
>>> struct pcr_handle {
>>> @@ -957,6 +960,8 @@ struct rtsx_pcr {
>>>
>>> int num_slots;
>>> struct rtsx_slot *slots;
>>> +
>>> + u8 dma_error_count;
>>> };
>>>
>>> #define CHK_PCI_PID(pcr, pid) ((pcr)->pci->device == (pid))
>> begin:vcard
>> fn;quoted-printable:=E5=86=AF=E4=BC=9F
>> n;quoted-printable:;=E5=86=AF=E4=BC=9F
>> email;internet:steven_feng@...lsil.com.cn
>> tel;cell:18168990403
>> version:2.1
>> end:vcard
>>
>
View attachment "steven_feng.vcf" of type "text/x-vcard" (184 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists