[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170409095121.5f0b6a1e@sf>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 09:51:21 +0100
From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@...too.org>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ia64: fix module loading for gcc-5.4
On Sun, 9 Apr 2017 10:27:52 +0200
SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> > That caused ia64 module loader to choke
> > on such instructions:
> > fuse: invalid slot number 1 for IMM64
>
> Why does it matter to check such a value?
I'm not sure I follow the question. Is your question about
linux kernel relocation code handler, gcc or ia64 instruction
format?
--
Sergei
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists