[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170410074457.GB25354@krava>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:44:57 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@...tor.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
wangnan0@...wei.com, ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
mhiramat@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
erosca@...adit-jv.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] perf tools: fix perf build with ARCH=x86_64
On Sun, Apr 09, 2017 at 07:43:15PM -0700, Jiada Wang wrote:
> Hello Jiri
>
> On 04/09/2017 10:27 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 11:25:44PM -0700, jiada_wang@...tor.com wrote:
> > > From: Jiada Wang<jiada_wang@...tor.com>
> > >
> > > with commit: 0a943cb10ce78 (tools build: Add HOSTARCH Makefile variable)
> > > the following build failure is seen when build with ARCH=x86_64
> > is that described somewhere as a valid building interface?
> > I never use it so I have no idea.. would you describe your
> > build env/process?
> I used "ARCH=x86_64 make -C tools perf V=1" to build perf for x86_64 ARCH.
you're on x86 machine right? I don't see CROSS_COMPILE being used..
what's the purpose of the ARCH var setup then?
>
> > > In file included from util/event.c:2:0:
> > > tools/include/uapi/linux/mman.h:4:27: fatal error: uapi/asm/mman.h: No such file or directory
> > > compilation terminated.
> > >
> > > fix this issue by use SRCARCH instead of ARCH in perf.
> > please describe also the the issue itself in the changelog, not just the fix
> I will update changelog with detail information about the issue in v4
> >
> >
> > so objtool is using SRCARCH this way, I guess it's fine
> >
> > if we go this way, you also need to change the pmu-events/Build
> > and there's some comment using $(ARCH) in util/header.c
> will update pmu-events/Build in v4
I'll check
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists