[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170410150503.GS17774@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:05:03 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, sudeep.holla@....com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, broonie@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix issues and factorize arm/arm64 capacity
information code
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 02:18:16PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> arm and arm64 topology.c share a lot of code related to parsing of capacity
> information. This is v3 of a solution [1] (based on Will's, Catalin's and
> Mark's off-line suggestions) to move such common code in a single place:
> drivers/base/arch_topology.c (by creating such file and conditionally compiling
> it for arm and arm64 only).
I think overall this is okay, with the exception of one patch which seems
to be wrongly worded. Once that's resolved, then:
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
for the series.
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists