linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix issues and factorize arm/arm64 capacity information code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:21:48 +0100
From:   Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, sudeep.holla@....com,
        lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, broonie@...nel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Fix issues and factorize arm/arm64 capacity
 information code

Hi,

On 10/04/17 16:05, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 02:18:16PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > arm and arm64 topology.c share a lot of code related to parsing of capacity
> > information. This is v3 of a solution [1] (based on Will's, Catalin's and
> > Mark's off-line suggestions) to move such common code in a single place:
> > drivers/base/arch_topology.c (by creating such file and conditionally compiling
> > it for arm and arm64 only).
> 
> I think overall this is okay, with the exception of one patch which seems
> to be wrongly worded.

As I said in reply to your comments, we could also consider dropping
that patch entirely. What's your opinion?

> Once that's resolved, then:
> 
> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> 
> for the series.
> 

Also, I'd like to update 3/9 as suggested by Vincent.

Thanks for the review.

Best,

- Juri