| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20170412115354.jkyzy26kv7pobtn2@dell>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:53:54 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: gnurou@...il.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org, edubezval@...il.com,
dvhart@...radead.org, rui.zhang@...el.com, andy@...radead.org,
hdegoede@...hat.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, sathyaosid@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc: use chained irqs for
second level irq chips
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Whishkey cove PMIC has support to mask/unmask interrupts at two levels.
> At first level we can mask/unmask interrupt domains like TMU, GPIO, ADC,
> CHGR, BCU THERMAL and PWRBTN and at second level, it provides facility
> to mask/unmask individual interrupts belong each of this domain. For
> example, in case of TMU, at first level we have TMU interrupt domain,
> and at second level we have two interrupts, wake alarm, system alarm that
> belong to the TMU interrupt domain.
>
> Currently, in this driver all first level irqs are registered as part of
> irq chip(bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip). By default, after you register the irq
> chip from your driver, all irqs in that chip will masked and can only be
> enabled if that irq is requested using request_irq call. This is the
> default Linux irq behavior model. And whenever a dependent device that
> belongs to PMIC requests only the second level irq and not explicitly
> unmask the first level irq, then in essence the second level irq will
> still be disabled. For example, if TMU device driver request wake_alarm
> irq and not explicitly unmask TMU level 1 irq then according to the default
> Linux irq model, wake_alarm irq will still be disabled. So the proper
> solution to fix this issue is to use the chained irq chip concept. We
> should chain all the second level chip irqs to the corresponding first
> level irq. To do this, we need to create separate irq chips for every
> group of second level irqs.
>
> In case of TMU, when adding second level irq chip, instead of using pmic
> irq we should use the corresponding first level irq. So the following
> code will change from
>
> ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(pmic->regmap, pmic->irq, ...)
>
> to,
>
> virq = regmap_irq_get_virq(&pmic->irq_chip_data, BXTWC_TMU_LVL1_IRQ);
>
> ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(pmic->regmap, virq, ...)
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c | 212 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h | 5 +
> 2 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c
> index dc8af1d..807eba3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.c
> @@ -81,18 +81,26 @@ enum bxtwc_irqs {
> BXTWC_PWRBTN_IRQ,
> };
>
> -enum bxtwc_irqs_level2 {
> - /* Level 2 */
> +enum bxtwc_irqs_tmu {
> + BXTWC_TMU_IRQ = 0,
> +};
> +
> +enum bxtwc_irqs_bcu {
> BXTWC_BCU_IRQ = 0,
> - BXTWC_ADC_IRQ,
> - BXTWC_USBC_IRQ,
> +};
> +
> +enum bxtwc_irqs_adc {
> + BXTWC_ADC_IRQ = 0,
> +};
> +
> +enum bxtwc_irqs_chgr {
> + BXTWC_USBC_IRQ = 0,
> BXTWC_CHGR0_IRQ,
> BXTWC_CHGR1_IRQ,
> - BXTWC_CRIT_IRQ,
> };
>
> -enum bxtwc_irqs_tmu {
> - BXTWC_TMU_IRQ = 0,
> +enum bxtwc_irqs_crit {
> + BXTWC_CRIT_IRQ = 0,
> };
>
> static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs[] = {
> @@ -107,17 +115,26 @@ static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs[] = {
> REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_PWRBTN_IRQ, 1, 0x03),
> };
>
> -static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs_level2[] = {
> +static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs_tmu[] = {
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_TMU_IRQ, 0, 0x06),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs_bcu[] = {
> REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_BCU_IRQ, 0, 0x1f),
> - REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_ADC_IRQ, 1, 0xff),
> - REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_USBC_IRQ, 2, BIT(5)),
> - REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_CHGR0_IRQ, 2, 0x1f),
> - REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_CHGR1_IRQ, 3, 0x1f),
> - REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_CRIT_IRQ, 6, 0x03),
> };
>
> -static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs_tmu[] = {
> - REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_TMU_IRQ, 0, 0x06),
> +static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs_adc[] = {
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_ADC_IRQ, 0, 0xff),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs_chgr[] = {
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_USBC_IRQ, 0, BIT(5)),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_CHGR0_IRQ, 0, 0x1f),
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_CHGR1_IRQ, 1, 0x1f),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct regmap_irq bxtwc_regmap_irqs_crit[] = {
> + REGMAP_IRQ_REG(BXTWC_CRIT_IRQ, 0, 0x03),
> };
>
> static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip = {
> @@ -129,15 +146,6 @@ static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip = {
> .num_regs = 2,
> };
>
> -static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_level2 = {
> - .name = "bxtwc_irq_chip_level2",
> - .status_base = BXTWC_BCUIRQ,
> - .mask_base = BXTWC_MBCUIRQ,
> - .irqs = bxtwc_regmap_irqs_level2,
> - .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(bxtwc_regmap_irqs_level2),
> - .num_regs = 10,
> -};
> -
> static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_tmu = {
> .name = "bxtwc_irq_chip_tmu",
> .status_base = BXTWC_TMUIRQ,
> @@ -147,6 +155,42 @@ static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_tmu = {
> .num_regs = 1,
> };
>
> +static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_bcu = {
> + .name = "bxtwc_irq_chip_bcu",
> + .status_base = BXTWC_BCUIRQ,
> + .mask_base = BXTWC_MBCUIRQ,
> + .irqs = bxtwc_regmap_irqs_bcu,
> + .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(bxtwc_regmap_irqs_bcu),
> + .num_regs = 1,
> +};
> +
> +static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_adc = {
> + .name = "bxtwc_irq_chip_adc",
> + .status_base = BXTWC_ADCIRQ,
> + .mask_base = BXTWC_MADCIRQ,
> + .irqs = bxtwc_regmap_irqs_adc,
> + .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(bxtwc_regmap_irqs_adc),
> + .num_regs = 1,
> +};
> +
> +static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_chgr = {
> + .name = "bxtwc_irq_chip_chgr",
> + .status_base = BXTWC_CHGR0IRQ,
> + .mask_base = BXTWC_MCHGR0IRQ,
> + .irqs = bxtwc_regmap_irqs_chgr,
> + .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(bxtwc_regmap_irqs_chgr),
> + .num_regs = 2,
> +};
> +
> +static struct regmap_irq_chip bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_crit = {
> + .name = "bxtwc_irq_chip_crit",
> + .status_base = BXTWC_CRITIRQ,
> + .mask_base = BXTWC_MCRITIRQ,
> + .irqs = bxtwc_regmap_irqs_crit,
> + .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(bxtwc_regmap_irqs_crit),
> + .num_regs = 1,
> +};
> +
> static struct resource gpio_resources[] = {
> DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(BXTWC_GPIO_LVL1_IRQ, "GPIO"),
> };
> @@ -358,6 +402,34 @@ static const struct regmap_config bxtwc_regmap_config = {
> .reg_read = regmap_ipc_byte_reg_read,
> };
>
> +static int bxtwc_add_chained_irq_chip(struct intel_soc_pmic *pmic,
> + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *pdata,
> + int pirq,
> + int irq_flags,
Nit: These do not need to be on separate lines.
> + const struct regmap_irq_chip *chip,
> + struct regmap_irq_chip_data **data,
> + int *irq)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_irq_get_virq(pdata, pirq);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(pmic->dev, "failed to get virtual interrupt=%d\n", ret);
s/=/: /
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + *irq = ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(pmic->regmap, *irq, irq_flags, 0,
> + chip, data);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(pmic->dev, "Failed to add %s irq chip\n", chip->name);
s/irq/IRQ/
> + return -ENODEV;
Why aren't you returning ret?
In fact, remove this line and ...
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
... return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int bxtwc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int ret;
> @@ -409,22 +481,71 @@ static int bxtwc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(pmic->regmap, pmic->irq,
> - IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED,
> - 0, &bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_level2,
> - &pmic->irq_chip_data_level2);
> + ret = bxtwc_add_chained_irq_chip(pmic, pmic->irq_chip_data,
> + BXTWC_TMU_LVL1_IRQ,
> + IRQF_ONESHOT,
> + &bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_tmu,
> + &pmic->irq_chip_data_tmu,
> + &pmic->tmu_irq);
Isn't there a generic API for chained IRQs already?
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add secondary IRQ chip\n");
> - goto err_irq_chip_level2;
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add TMU IRQ chip\n");
> + goto err_irq_chip_tmu;
> }
>
> - ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(pmic->regmap, pmic->irq,
> - IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED,
> - 0, &bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_tmu,
> - &pmic->irq_chip_data_tmu);
> + /* add chained irq handler for BCU irqs */
Use proper grammar.
"Add chained IRQ handler for BCU IRQs"
> + ret = bxtwc_add_chained_irq_chip(pmic, pmic->irq_chip_data,
> + BXTWC_BCU_LVL1_IRQ,
> + IRQF_ONESHOT,
> + &bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_bcu,
> + &pmic->irq_chip_data_bcu,
> + &pmic->bcu_irq);
> +
> +
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add TMU IRQ chip\n");
> - goto err_irq_chip_tmu;
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add BUC IRQ chip\n");
> + goto err_irq_chip_bcu;
> + }
> +
> + /* add chained irq handler for ADC irqs */
Grammar.
> + ret = bxtwc_add_chained_irq_chip(pmic, pmic->irq_chip_data,
> + BXTWC_ADC_LVL1_IRQ,
> + IRQF_ONESHOT,
> + &bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_adc,
> + &pmic->irq_chip_data_adc,
> + &pmic->adc_irq);
> +
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add ADC IRQ chip\n");
> + goto err_irq_chip_adc;
> + }
> +
> + /* add chained irq handler for CHGR irqs */
> + ret = bxtwc_add_chained_irq_chip(pmic, pmic->irq_chip_data,
> + BXTWC_CHGR_LVL1_IRQ,
> + IRQF_ONESHOT,
> + &bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_chgr,
> + &pmic->irq_chip_data_chgr,
> + &pmic->chgr_irq);
> +
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add CHGR IRQ chip\n");
> + goto err_irq_chip_chgr;
> + }
> +
> + /* add chained irq handler for CRIT irqs */
> + ret = bxtwc_add_chained_irq_chip(pmic, pmic->irq_chip_data,
> + BXTWC_CRIT_LVL1_IRQ,
> + IRQF_ONESHOT,
> + &bxtwc_regmap_irq_chip_crit,
> + &pmic->irq_chip_data_crit,
> + &pmic->crit_irq);
> +
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add CRIT irq chip\n");
s/irq/IRQ/
> + goto err_irq_chip_crit;
> }
>
> ret = mfd_add_devices(&pdev->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, bxt_wc_dev,
> @@ -456,10 +577,16 @@ static int bxtwc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> err_sysfs:
> mfd_remove_devices(&pdev->dev);
> err_mfd:
> - regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_tmu);
> + regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->crit_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_crit);
> +err_irq_chip_crit:
> + regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->chgr_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_chgr);
> +err_irq_chip_chgr:
> + regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->adc_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_adc);
> +err_irq_chip_adc:
> + regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->bcu_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_bcu);
> +err_irq_chip_bcu:
> + regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->tmu_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_tmu);
> err_irq_chip_tmu:
> - regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_level2);
> -err_irq_chip_level2:
> regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->irq, pmic->irq_chip_data);
>
> return ret;
> @@ -472,8 +599,11 @@ static int bxtwc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> sysfs_remove_group(&pdev->dev.kobj, &bxtwc_group);
> mfd_remove_devices(&pdev->dev);
> regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->irq, pmic->irq_chip_data);
> - regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_level2);
> - regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_tmu);
> + regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->tmu_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_tmu);
> + regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->bcu_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_bcu);
> + regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->adc_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_adc);
> + regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->chgr_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_chgr);
> + regmap_del_irq_chip(pmic->crit_irq, pmic->irq_chip_data_crit);
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h b/include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h
> index 956caa0..63e1270 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h
> @@ -23,10 +23,15 @@
>
> struct intel_soc_pmic {
> int irq;
> + int tmu_irq, bcu_irq, adc_irq, chgr_irq, crit_irq;
Each attribute should be on a line of their own.
> struct regmap *regmap;
> struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data;
> struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data_level2;
> struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data_tmu;
> + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data_bcu;
> + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data_adc;
> + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data_chgr;
> + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *irq_chip_data_crit;
> struct device *dev;
> };
>
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists