[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170413094639.484-1-jszhang@marvell.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:46:39 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
To: <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <gnurou@...il.com>
CC: <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: dwapb: use dwapb_read instead of readl_relaxed
Commit 67809b974a07 ("GPIO: gpio-dwapb: Change readl&writel to
dwapb_read&dwapb_write") missed this readl_relaxed() usage, I'm not
sure the reason, maybe for performance reason? But if we do care
the performance, we could use the relaxed io in dwapb_read and
dwapb_write.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
index 9c15ee4ef4e9..fe6cdb5d03d9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static void dwapb_toggle_trigger(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio, unsigned int offs)
static u32 dwapb_do_irq(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio)
{
- u32 irq_status = readl_relaxed(gpio->regs + GPIO_INTSTATUS);
+ u32 irq_status = dwapb_read(gpio, GPIO_INTSTATUS);
u32 ret = irq_status;
while (irq_status) {
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists