[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170412.215206.1568460664651298892.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:52:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...nel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, lenb@...nel.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
rjw@...ysocki.net, tj@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 06/13] sparc/sysfs: Replace racy task affinity logic
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 22:07:32 +0200
> @@ -142,7 +122,8 @@ static unsigned long write_mmustat_enabl
> static ssize_t show_mmustat_enable(struct device *s,
> struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> - unsigned long val = run_on_cpu(s->id, read_mmustat_enable, 0);
> + long val = work_on_cpu(s->id, read_mmustat_enable, 0);
Last argument to work_on_cpu() should be NULL since it's a pointer
I guess.
But otherwise I have no problems with this:
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists