[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1704150040420.29296@eddie.linux-mips.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 00:45:42 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 27/32] MIPS: Force o32 fp64 support on 32bit MIPS64r6
kernels
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Force o32 fp64 support in this case by also selecting
> MIPS_O32_FP64_SUPPORT from CPU_MIPS64_R6 if 32BIT.
[...]
> --- a/arch/mips/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/mips/Kconfig
> @@ -1412,7 +1412,7 @@ config CPU_MIPS32_R6
> select CPU_SUPPORTS_MSA
> select GENERIC_CSUM
> select HAVE_KVM
> - select MIPS_O32_FP64_SUPPORT
> + select MIPS_O32_FP64_SUPPORT if 32BIT
> help
> Choose this option to build a kernel for release 6 or later of the
> MIPS32 architecture. New MIPS processors, starting with the Warrior
Has the patch been misapplied? Its description refers to CPU_MIPS64_R6,
however the hunk heading in the diff itself indicates CPU_MIPS32_R6.
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists