linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/18] 4.4.62-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:48:04 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To:     "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/18] 4.4.62-stable review

On 04/16/2017 06:57 AM, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-rc/linux-4.4.y boot: 87 boots: 2 failed, 82 passed with 3 offline (v4.4.61-19-ge153e9e2397b)
> 
> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.4.y/kernel/v4.4.61-19-ge153e9e2397b/
> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.4.y/kernel/v4.4.61-19-ge153e9e2397b/
> 
> Tree: stable-rc
> Branch: linux-4.4.y
> Git Describe: v4.4.61-19-ge153e9e2397b
> Git Commit: e153e9e2397bd8b93af00fdf9a417568b342e271
> Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> Tested: 12 unique boards, 6 SoC families, 22 builds out of 201
> 
> Boot Regressions Detected:
> 
> arm:
> 
>     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n:
>         exynos5250-snow:
>             lab-collabora: failing since 92 days (last pass: v4.4.40-59-g1d41ca34dce6 - first fail: v4.4.42-28-g707ffd8554f6)

My understanding is that CONFIG_SMP=n is blacklisted for exynos.
Are you testing this config now?

I will follow up to see if !SMP use-case is important one to fix it.
That said, I am not sure if this is a regression in the sense that,
if !SMP ever worked on exynos.

thanks,
-- Shuah