[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f07f037-be71-6b5f-86a2-8d3e714cd227@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 12:51:19 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.10 00/29] 4.10.11-stable review
On 04/16/2017 07:37 AM, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-rc/linux-4.10.y boot: 102 boots: 5 failed, 96 passed with 1 offline (v4.10.10-30-ge78d0ce7bd97)
>
> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.10.y/kernel/v4.10.10-30-ge78d0ce7bd97/
> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-4.10.y/kernel/v4.10.10-30-ge78d0ce7bd97/
>
> Tree: stable-rc
> Branch: linux-4.10.y
> Git Describe: v4.10.10-30-ge78d0ce7bd97
> Git Commit: e78d0ce7bd973c80af14dbd45c095bfef41cb838
> Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> Tested: 15 unique boards, 8 SoC families, 25 builds out of 205
>
> Boot Failures Detected:
>
> arm64:
>
> allmodconfig
> meson-gxbb-p200: 1 failed lab
>
> x86:
>
> allnoconfig
> minnowboard-max: 1 failed lab
>
> tinyconfig
> minnowboard-max: 1 failed lab
>
> allmodconfig+CONFIG_OF=n
> minnowboard-max: 1 failed lab
>
> arm:
>
> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_SMP=n
> exynos5250-snow: 1 failed lab
>
Is this the same as the one we are seeing on 4.4.xx? I am curious
why we don't see this on 4.9.xx - Is this config not tested on 4.9.xx
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists