[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170419072054.3bxb7fapyj7jodnn@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:20:54 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 01:11:10PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> +++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
> @@ -185,6 +186,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(jiffies_64);
> #define WHEEL_SIZE (LVL_SIZE * LVL_DEPTH)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
> +/*
> + * If multiple bases need to be locked, use the base ordering for lock
> + * nesting, i.e. lowest number first.
> + */
> # define NR_BASES 3
> # define BASE_LOCAL 0
> # define BASE_GLOBAL 1
You already used that in previous patches, should this comment go there?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists