[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170419072411.uxd7spyzgs5oszah@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:24:11 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 01:11:10PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> @@ -1689,11 +1708,16 @@ static void run_timer_base(int index, bo
> */
> static __latent_entropy void run_timer_softirq(struct softirq_action *h)
> {
> + struct timer_base *base = this_cpu_ptr(&timer_bases[BASE_LOCAL]);
Does this want to be inside the IS_ENABLED() block below? It seems to me
this could generate an unused variable warning for !NO_HZ_COMMON
compiler.
> +
> run_timer_base(BASE_LOCAL, false);
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON)) {
> run_timer_base(BASE_GLOBAL, false);
> run_timer_base(BASE_DEF, true);
> +
> + if (base->nohz_active)
> + tmigr_handle_remote();
> }
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists