[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170419095002.n2m6hsehfy2hzscn@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:50:02 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
wanpeng li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
hidehiro kawai ez <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Fengtiantian <fengtiantian@...wei.com>,
Xiexiuqi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] x86: call smp vmxoff in smp stop
* Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > > On 18/01/2017 12:32, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> > > > From: Tiantian Feng <fengtiantian@...wei.com>
> > > >
> > > > We need to disable VMX on all CPUs before stop cpu when OS panic,
> > > > otherwisewe risk hanging up the machine, because the CPU ignore INIT
> > > > signals when VMX is enabled. In kernel mainline this issue existence.
> >
> > Yes, but the changelog is atrcious:
> >
> > - title should describe the purpose, not the implementation
> >
> > - CPU is spelled 'CPU' once, then 'cpu' _in the same sentence_!
> >
> > - typos
> >
> > - spelling
> >
> > - the last sentence doesn't even parse ...
> >
> > Still it's already at V4 and comes with two signoffs and what amounts to a
> > maintainer Ack??
>
> Well, the v2-v4 were really just about getting the signoffs right. At some
> point you just get desensitized about the changelog. :(
>
> I'll post v5 with a rewritten commit message.
Thanks!
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists