[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2236FBA76BA1254E88B949DDB74E612B41C8D7AE@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:28:22 +0000
From: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Yan, Zheng" <zyan@...hat.com>, Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] fs, ceph filesystem refcount conversions
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Reshetova, Elena
> <elena.reshetova@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Elena Reshetova
> >> <elena.reshetova@...el.com> wrote:
> >> > Now when new refcount_t type and API are finally merged
> >> > (see include/linux/refcount.h), the following
> >> > patches convert various refcounters in the ceph filesystem from atomic_t
> >> > to refcount_t. By doing this we prevent intentional or accidental
> >> > underflows or overflows that can led to use-after-free vulnerabilities.
> >> >
> >> > The below patches are fully independent and can be cherry-picked
> separately.
> >> > Since we convert all kernel subsystems in the same fashion, resulting
> >> > in about 300 patches, we have to group them for sending at least in some
> >> > fashion to be manageable. Please excuse the long cc list.
> >> >
> >> > Not runtime tested, since I am not sure how to do it for ceph.
> >> > However changes are pretty trivial in this case.
> >> >
> >> > Elena Reshetova (2):
> >> > fs, ceph: convert ceph_mds_session.s_ref from atomic_t to refcount_t
> >> > fs, ceph: convert ceph_cap_snap.nref from atomic_t to refcount_t
> >> >
> >> > fs/ceph/caps.c | 4 ++--
> >> > fs/ceph/mds_client.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> >> > fs/ceph/mds_client.h | 5 +++--
> >> > fs/ceph/snap.c | 2 +-
> >> > fs/ceph/super.h | 5 +++--
> >> > 5 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> I'll pull these into testing.
> >
> > Just a check: how did testing went on this?
> > If everything is good, can you merge the changes?
>
> Yep, I'll merge these into 4.12.
Great, thank you!
Best Regards,
Elena.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ilya
Powered by blists - more mailing lists